Survodutide vs Retatrutide

Verdict: Retatrutide wins on weight loss (~24% vs ~19% in their respective phase 2 trials), but survodutide has the more striking liver data — 83% of MASH patients improved without fibrosis worsening — and is being developed as a liver drug first. Choose the comparison by the problem: fat mass favors retatrutide, fatty liver is where survodutide's evidence is strongest. Both are unapproved and in phase 3.

Side by side

SurvodutideRetatrutide
Typical dose600 mcg–6 mg1 mg–12 mg
Frequency1x weekly, titrated up over ~20 weeks1x weekly, titrated up
Administrationsubcutaneous injectionsubcutaneous injection
Common vials5 mg, 10 mg5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg
Typical mix10 mg + 2 ml water10 mg + 2 ml water
Units for typical dose48 units (2.4 mg)40 units (2 mg)

Same glucagon idea, different partner

Both compounds bet on glucagon agonism for energy expenditure and liver-fat clearance. Survodutide pairs it only with GLP-1; retatrutide adds GIP, which appears to amplify weight loss and improve GI tolerability per unit of effect — the tirzepatide lesson applied to a triple agonist.

Titration is where they diverge in practice

Survodutide's phase 2 protocol climbed 0.6 → 1.2 → 2.4 → 3.6 → 4.8 mg with fast escalation, and discontinuation from nausea was high — later trials slowed the ramp. Retatrutide's ramp runs 1 → 2 → 4 → 8 → 12 mg over months. Starting doses differ by roughly 2×, so dose numbers must never be carried between them.

Evidence status

Survodutide: phase 3 SYNCHRONIZE (obesity) and LIVERAGE (MASH) programs ongoing. Retatrutide: phase 3 TRIUMPH program across obesity, diabetes, sleep apnea and osteoarthritis. Neither has approval anywhere; both are years from a pharmacy shelf.

Can you stack them?

Not stacked with each other or with other incretin drugs. Both protocols emphasize protein, lifting and slow titration over any add-on peptide.

More comparisons

Educational comparison based on commonly published research protocols — not medical advice or an endorsement of any compound.